Think of the Children

The Washington Post Book World has printed its list of the Best Books for Young People for 2007. I’ll bet that you were as surprised as I was that Bill O’Reilly’s book for children was not on the list.

Alan Dershowitz reviews O’Reilly’s Kids Are Americans Too, also in the Washington Post. Its never too early to make sure that your kids learn the truth about activist judges, bonehead juries, and other morons that are destroying our nation. From the review:

This book is so riddled with errors, inconsistencies, bad advice and hypocrisy that by O’Reilly’s own standards — we must not “leave children exposed to harm” — it should be placed in the adults-only section of the bookstore. Or better yet, with the joke books.

No way! Totally didn’t see that coming.

BGB: Not Snooty

Another unsolicited testimonial!

Annie, writing at Metroblogging Atlanta, says:

Baby Got Books not only has a catchy name, but most of their contributors are Atlanta-based. And with a name like that, you can be assured that while they are literary, they are not also snooty.

Note: Lovers of books should give themselves a good chunk of time to peruse these sites – They are black holes for readers.

She also gives a sgout out to our friends at Wordmsmiths.  Thanks, Annie.

Seen in Little Five Points

I have no idea what this means.

Night on the Town

Mrs. Got Books and I found ourselves invited to the Atlanta Press Club’s Annual Holiday Author Party last night. It was my first time attending the event, and I wasn’t sure what to expect. Basically, authors man tables and talk about their books with anyone who is interested enough to stop by. Food and drinks are served.

Authors on hand included my friend Kelly, who was signing her book on retirement planning (a great gift item or New Year’s resolution reference!). Pulitzer-winner Hank Klibanoff was there with his book The Race Beat. Karin Abbott, author of Sin in the Second City, was in the house. There were maybe thirty authors in all.

I was introduced to author Stephanie Bond, a writer of mystery/romance novels – what she called commercial fiction. She has written a “voodoo” mystery series that was based in and around New Orleans and the fictional Mojo, Louisiana. (There really should be a Mojo, LA.) We talked about New Orleans, Flexcar, and life in the big city. I enjoyed chatting with her and will need to check out her books.

The event was held at the new World of Coca-Cola , “Home of the Multi-National Corporate Branding Experience.” Eventually everyone made their way into the tasting room, where desserts were being served. The tasting room features Coke products from around the world. The selections from Africa were especially interesting. Bibo, a South African brand, featured flavors like Candy Pine Nut and DJ Kiwi Mango. Yum. If you ever go to the World of Coke, avoid Italy’s Beverly soda. Not so good.

There was also a silent auction. We came away with a weekend at the beach for shockingly little money. Score!

Kindle, Tool of Ingsoc

Hmm.  Amazon’s Kindle seemed merely ill-conceived at first blush.  The Future of Reading (A Play in Six Acts) – don’t worry, they’re short – takes a look at some of the potentially sinister implications of the new technology.  Act V is especially worrisome.  (via Librarian.net)

Village Voice Has A List, Too

Striking a balance between the “too few” Top 10 list and a “too many” 100 Notables list, the Village Voice comes up with a Top 20 books of 2007 list.  I always keep an eye out for the Village Voice list, because it usually contains selections that won’t be found elsewhere.  That said, it does pick The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao (BGB review), which is showing up everywhere (deservedly).  I was happy to see Petropolis make the list (BGB review).   The Yiddish Policemen’s Union also makes the list (BGB reviews 1, 2, 3).  The list does overlook the seemingly unananimous selections of other lists: Tree of Smoke and The Savage Detectives.

My top 10 list for 2007 will hit news stands next week.

Atomik Aztex

I decided that it was finally time to get around to reading Atomik Aztex by Sesshu Foster based upon my enjoyment of The Brief and Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao.  Both books are “offbeat” and feature Latin American/Caribbean settings and themes. It seemed to be a groove worth settling into. (I used to “theme” read much more often that I do now…)

Aztex had several other items in the “plus column” to recommend it: it won The Believer Book Award (2006), it was published by City Lights, and it was edited by Lawrence Ferlinghetti. Those are all positives as far as I’m concerned. Expectations were high. If I able to tell you with any certainty what the book is about, it might have succeeded in meeting those expectations. The failings may be mine.

Aztex could be about several things. It could be about the ancient Aztex (I’m going with the plural used in the novel) and their belief in multiple and simultaneous conceptions of time, place, and history. An oracle of sorts goes into epileptic fits wherein he has vivid visions of alternate realities. In most realities, the Aztex are proud rulers of most of the known world. In others, they have allowed themselves to be duped by Europeans and find that their civilization has melted away into the jungles.

A truly inspired piece of the novel involves the Aztex joining forces with the Russians in 1942 in preparation for turning back the Nazis. The Aztex, masters of spiritual “aesthetiks,” are decked out in feathered capes, golden jewelry and facial piercings. Zenzontli, our narrator, evaluates the Aztex prospects:

…these Germans don’t have a chance here in Stalingrad. Cuz they’re just going along, doing their job as they see it, not expecting the unexpected, then some Aztek warriors jump out at them! Then they’re f*cked, right? Cuz who has the elements of surprise? The Germans, who think they’re over here clearing out some lebensraum from lesser Slavik races so they can erect fortress cities across the steppes, built on a plan of Teutonik efficiency, the local population cleared out except for slave labor camps? Or us — your Aztek special forces warriors — who are sneaky, tough, hardened, intelligent, good looking, all around nice guys, studded with all types of metaphysikal dekorations, war paint, spiritual jewelery studs sticking out of our faces, stern, determined brows, quetzal feathers and plumes of rare vanishing species of the rainforest? No contest, right? Now you know why the Germans had to lose World War 2.

The novel may be about an undocumented Mexican factory worker in a California meat packing plant in the forties who is trying to organize the workers. His daily grind sprinkled with vivid fantasies of the lost glory of his people.  Maybe.

It could also be an absurdist indictment of our current political situation. The Azteks continue to perform human sacrifice to fuel the engine of their “teknospiritual economik” society. Naturally, human sacrifice can make some pansies on the left a little philosophical:

We Aztex also gotta admit that we have things to learn from the peoples whose hearts we’re cutting out. We have to control our own science, teknology, and power when we subjugate primitive kultures and cut their hearts out in the most cost-efficient, legal manner possible. That’s all there is to it. I know that this is not a popular position.

and

The generals on both sides tried to put some order into their mass catastrophe, but without real success and without any substantial Modern Aesthetik guidelines. In our Aztek view, that was their main flaw. All this death and destruction without any poetik or aesthetik point to it meant that Tezkatlipoka, Huitzilopochtli, and the universal forces they represent would never really take any notice, nothing would come of it… — not where it counted on the teknospiritual plane…

Zenzontli seems to be the narrator throughout the novel. I could be wrong. The narrator(s?) also appears to have some confusion about the reality of the tale:

…you are receiving the Truth and unalloyed facts of someone who was there…That’s why everything that I say is completely objective and everything happened exactly like I say. Becuz…I can’t remember why…but I’m sure it’s true…probably becuz I suspect that everything happened just like the way that I think it happened…

In the end of course, the point may be that all of reality is subjective. In the words of Zenzontli:

Prove you are alive. Prove it.

You’d think that I would have unreservedly loved a novel that I quoted this extensively from. And yet, the truth of the matter is that I often found myself adrift in the novel, and not in a good way. As much as I was dazzled by the writing, I came away feeling that there may not have been any poetik or aesthetik point to the exercise. I’d love to have it explained to me.

Reading to the bottom bonus: I Bookmooch-ed this one, so it didn’t cost me anything. If you want to take Aztex for a spin and report back to me on what you make of the whole thing (that’s part of the deal!), I’ll drop it in the mail. Leave a comment below if you want it. Otherwise, it’s going back into my Bookmooch inventory.

Today’s Lists

The Globe and Mail (Canada) has published a list of 100 notable books of 2007. It’s like the NYT 100 notable books, except it is cleaner and more polite. The list can recognize “icing” in hockey on sight, and its money looks funny. It will also tell you all about its superior health care system. (via Pickle Me This)

Bookfox lists the best short story collections of 2007-ish.

…and I forgot to mention a list that’s been floating around for a while now: Amazon Editor’s Top 100 Books of 2007 (thanks for the sending link, SallyR).

I feel bad about my gunshot wound

I was looking forward to the movie version of No Country for Old Men. Okay, I’ve been obsessed with the movie version of No Country for Old Men ever since I heard it was in the works and couldn’t wait to see it. I don’t get to the theaters much anymore, but any time my favorite filmmakers adapt a novel by my favorite novelist, they’ll get my $9.50.

I’m on record as saying that this wasn’t Cormac’s finest book. I wouldn’t rate No Country in Cormac McCarthy’s top five, or even eight, novels, but it lent itself exceptionally well to adaptation for the big screen and the character Anton Chigurh was one for the ages. That much was obvious going in.

I couldn’t wait to see how the Coens would do three things:

1) Depict what is really the main character in the story (at least the first half of it): the bleak West Texas landscape;
2) Depict Chigurh, truly one of the most original fictional characters I’ve ever come across; and
3) Be faithful to the tension-building atmosphere Cormac created in the novel. I thought that if they could remain true to the long stretches in the novel without any dialogue, they’d create a masterpiece.

The verdict: the cinematography was austerely gorgeous. Javier Bardem as Chigurh was treeeee-mendous. And the Coens created a masterpiece. (Compare it to Billy Bob Thornton’s adaptation of All the Pretty Horses. It’s not a fair fight.)

When I saw the movie last week it had been more than two years since I read the book, so I couldn’t place every single scene and compare it to how Cormac had written it, but I didn’t much care. By the end of the movie I honestly couldn’t tell where Cormac’s vision ended and the Coens’ began. I mean that as the highest compliment. I thought the ending, which has been criticized elsewhere, was perfect.

So I was thinking about what I wanted to say about this movie and wondering if I could recommend it to someone who hasn’t read the novel or formed a — well, obsession with McCarthy’s fiction, when I read Nora Ephron’s parody in the New Yorker. I think that pretty well answered my question.

Special bonus: If you’re a Coen bros. fan, you may have an experience like I did during the most chilling scene of the movie, the one where Chigurh makes a convenience store clerk call heads-or-tails for his mortal soul. (It’s in the trailer.) I kept having flashbacks to the “No, unless’n round is funny” scene from Raising Arizona. The people sitting around me in the theater couldn’t figure out why I was laughing.

Double-special bonus: my local newspaper reports that John Turturro is working with the Coens on a spin-off of The Big Lebowski, which will explore the character The Jesus.

And Finally, The Road

I may be the last person in America to read Cormac McCarthy’s The Road. BGB’s Dr J eloquently reviewed the novel a year ago. Since then, the book has won every book award in the known universe (except the Literary Review’s Bad Sex Award). Despite the accolades, I’ve been actively avoiding the book since it came out. I was expecting the book to be a grim and ultra-emotional read. Each time that I looked at the book in my “to be read” stack I wasn’t sure that I was in “that place.”

 

Finally: last night I decided to pick it up. I had just finished a very long and ultimately unsatisfying “important” book. Rather than go to bed, I decided to read a few pages of The Road. Before I knew it, a few pages had turned into 287 and I was up waaaaay past my bed time. While I don’t recommend that anyone repeat this kind of marathon session on a school night, I’m glad that I got to experience the novel in a single sitting. McCarthy deserves every award that was bestowed upon him for the novel.

The book has been reviewed and talked about everywhere, so I’m not going to write much more about it here. Except to say this:

Cormac McCarthy told Oprah that the novel was a love letter of sorts to his young son. I think that it should be handed out to everyone considering having a child with a note that says, “Here’s what’s expected of you. Don’t let us down.”

Lists O’ Plenty

The Washington Post:

Boston Globe:

New York Times – Holiday Books:

The New York Times Notable Children’s Books of 2007 (with multimedia presentation of the best illustrated books)

William Safire on Biblliogifts

Paste Magazine asks various luminaries to reveal their favorite reads of 2007

WordPress Themes