Last Lists of 2007

Can it really be the very last post of 2007 already? How did that happen?

To round out the year, I’ve slapped together some year-end musical favorites of mine. I’ve also linked to some gems from my top secret vault of trusted internet sources for awesomness™.

Come back and visit us in 2008. We’ve got big plans for the New Year. We look forward to seeing you then. Happy New Year!

The Prince

Not being very well-read in the classics or in the areas of political science, philosophy or psychology, and being a guy who uses the term “Machiavellian” more than anyone I know, I thought it made sense for me to read Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince. The version I read was translated by Daniel Donno.

Given (a) how short this book is (less than 100 small pages), (b) how much I assumed I already knew about what it means to be “Machiavellian, and (c) that this book was written almost five hundred years ago, in another language, I really didn’t expect a whole lot here, other than perhaps some difficult to understand confirmations of what I thought I already knew. I don’t think I’ve ever been more wrong in my presumptions regarding a book.

There’s a reason that this book is heralded as a masterwork on what it takes to obtain and hold power. I can’t think of another book in which such fundamental theories (whether they be right or wrong, and regardless of subject matter) have been articulated so clearly and succinctly, yet so profoundly. I refuse to quote any passages here, because there is virtually no excess verbiage in the entire book; it’s as if to pick and choose any of Macchiavelli’s distinct ideas to the exclusion of others would be to rank the others as less deserving of mention, which would be wrong. In fact, I didn’t even read this book so much as I studied it; I used a highlighter, which I ran dry as I found myself highlighting almost every sentence.

Macchiavelli is incredibly astute in his descriptions of the different types of principalities that exist and the proper way to maintain power of each of them, how best to deal with the military, the nobles, and the common people, the types of persons to surround yourself with when in power, how to treat the assets of your people vs. assets acquired from others, and, perhaps most famously of all, whether it is better to be loved or to be feared, to be kind or cruel, and when it is appropriate to be a “fox”, and when it is appropriate to be a “lion”. He presents his case so clearly and so compellingly that it is nearly impossible to argue that the prince who has the requisite skill and ability, and who is wise enough to prudently manipulate those around him (or her) as circumstances warrant and opportunities arise, is the most powerful and enduring of all.

Now, to the moral and ethical dilemmas raised by Macchiavelli’s ideas. I read this book objectively, without an eye toward right or wrong or any bias as to what would happen if everyone attempted to follow Macchiavelli’s advice. And in that regard, I stand by everything I said above — this man was an absolute genius. But, it must also be remembered that a genius, or someone following the direction of a genius, can do terrible things. And in that regard, Machiavelli’s wisdom, if appropriated and misused for evil, would be a very bad thing.

But the good news is that I am absolutely one hundred percent confident that a certain world leader in power right now is not smart enough to be Machiavellian.

The Year of Unfinished Books

So, you ask, why didn’t Weezie post much this year? Apparently because I couldn’t manage to finish a book. Oh, I started plenty of fantastic books. To wit, here are the books I began to read in 2007 (in no particular order):

The Kite Runner, Khaled Hosseini
The Yiddish Policeman’s Union, Michael Chabon
You Suck, Christopher Moore
Absurdistan, Gary Shteyngart
Saturday, Ian McEwan
The Nasty Bits, Tony Bourdain
The New York Trilogy, Paul Auster
I Like You, Amy Sedaris
Alone in the Kitchen with an Eggplant (Confessions of Cooking for One and Dining Alone), Jenni Ferrari-Adler, ed.
Native Guard, Natasha Tretheway (I almost finished this one, and I’m sure I will soon. If a collection of poetry can be described as a “page-turner,” this Pulitzer Prize winner is it. I promise I’ll post on it early next year.)
The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan (I’m in the middle of this one, and I just might finish it, although probably not until 2008.)

A diverse collection of books, but not a clunker among them, I would venture. So why didn’t I finish any of them? Who the hell knows. Adult-onset ADD? The fact that I picked up my life and moved it to California? And then took the California bar exam? And discovered that going out on a date was (often, but not always) more fun than staying home alone and reading a book? In any event, a resolution for 2008 is to actually read – beginning to end – more books. “More” being relative, of course. Two would be more than one. One being the number of books I finished in 2007. And what a great one it was: The Raw Shark Texts, by BGB rock star Steven Hall. The book has been blogged to death, so I won’t say any more than this – if it captured my attention sufficiently to finish it, it must be an amazing, just-can’t-put-it-down read.

Since we’re in list-making mode, I thought I would put one together. I did manage to listen to quite a lot of great music in 2007, so here’s my list of my 10 favorite albums of the year:

Andrew Bird, Armchair Apocrypha
The Arcade Fire, Neon Bible
Earlimart, Mentor Tormentor
The Fratellis, Costello Music
Radiohead, In Rainbows
The Shins, Wincing the Night Away
Sondre Lerche, Phantom Punch
Spoon, Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga
Bruce Springsteen, Magic
Amy Winehouse, Back to Black

Compare my list to the list of the best 25 albums of the year as voted by listeners of the NPR program “All Things Considered.” Am I a cliché of a demographic or what? On the other hand, compare it to the list of the 20 best albums of 2007 compiled by friend-of-BGB Frank, who could never be called cliché.

Anyway, thanks Tim, for keeping the blog so interesting and timely and fun. I promise there will be more reading – and posting – by Weezie in 2008.

More “Best of”

As I mentioned to Tim earlier this week, 2007 was sorely lacking in pleasurable reads for me. I don’t know why, but I started and stopped an inordinate number of critically-acclaimed books that just weren’t doing anything for me (these titles shall remain nameless to spare me from the harsh rebuke I would surely receive for not fawning over them). In fact, I’m not even sure how many books I managed to finish this year, although I know it’s way down from last year. Nonetheless, in the spirit of teamwork, I’ve put together my Top Six from this year, as best as I can recall. They are, in no particular order:

Also, let me throw a special shout-out in there for Banksy: Wall and Piece, just about the coolest coffee table book going.

Seasonal Salutations

On behalf of all of us here at BGB, Merry Christmas to one and all.  And Happy Belated Chanukah to our Jewish pals.  And a great Tuesday to the rest of you.

We’ll return to our regular scheduled programming soon.

–   The Management

Nitro’s 2007 Wrap-up

I know that this is the time of year that you are supposed to reflect on your achievements, disappointments, highs and lows for the year. I think it’s much more fun to take a look back at your book reading for the year. And I have to say – what a year it was! When I went back through everything that I had read this year, I realized that not only was it a prolific year but truly a year for originality and a lot of damn good books.

Unfortunately, my posts to this site slowed down to a halt the last few months of the year, but that was due to my over-scheduled, stressful life, not to a lack of reading either books or this blog. It’s hard to believe that this blog started as a year-end list and look how far it has come.

Hats off to Tim for keeping it going despite many days, weeks, etc when he was the only one adding info onto the site. And without further ado, here’s my list of my favorites that I read in 2007…….

And I still have some honorable mentions (it was tough this year narrowing down the selection):

Hmmm…..Interesting that my runner’s up are all non-fiction. I guess for me – there’s still nothing like a gripping novel.

More BGB Favorites of 2007

So many books, such a short attention span… Here are the books I couldn’t put down this year, despite my inability to sit in one place for long. Gotta love that young adult fiction category.

Honorable mention to:

Mencken, Humping, and the Bozart

Have you ever read something and it gets you digging around a little?  Next thing you know you’ve disappeared down a rabbit hole of information that you knew nothing about that may possibly be of interest to no one else but yourself? That happened to me yesterday. Let me tell you all about it.

Amelia reported on the Wren’s Nest Blog that the Joel Chandler Harris WikiPedia page had been vandalized. Apparently the perp was a bored 12 year old. The first clue was liberal use of the words hump, humping, humpers, etc. The second clue was describing JCH as “A STRIPPER!!!” It has since been repaired to its pre-humped condition.

As I read back through the Joel Chandler Harris entry, I noticed a quote that was critical of JCH that was attributed to H.L. Mencken with the citation “from The Sahara of the Bozart.” My first thought, this being a vandalized page, was that the citation was bogus. I hadn’t heard of the “The Sahara of the Bozart,” so I checked it out. It turns out (and you may already be aware of this) that it’s a title of an essay that is incredibly critical of the American South (and many other groups, countries, land masses, and individuals. “Bozart” is a malapropism of Beaux Arts.

I found the essay via Google Book Search in a collection of Mencken essays called Prejudices: Second Series (published in 1920 by Knopf). Mencken’s prejudices needed multiple volumes to be explored and enumerated thoroughly, apparently. From Menken’s non-humped WikiPedia page, it appears that he was the Christopher Hitchens of his day, an unrepentant contrarian. This may be old news to you, but I was learning something.

Back to the essay. It is certainly a scathing indictment of the South. The main thrust of the essay seems to be that following the Civil War, the elite class of Southern aristocracy was removed leaving behind a cultural wasteland that was being run by a lesser class of people that Mencken actually refers to as “animals” at one point.

There is certainly plenty of scorn in the essay that extends well beyond just Southerners. A quick catalog of groups/regions/countries that may take offense from its contents: Baptist and Methodists, the Welsh, Yankees, New Englanders, Asia Minor, Armenians, Greeks, Poland, Portugal, Serbia, Esthonia, the Mid-West, Gobi, Lapland, Nicaragua, Balkans, the China Coast, the Irish, French, Spanish, and Germans. I’m sure that I’m leaving somethone out.

At one point it appears that Joel Chandler Harris’ 12 year-old took over the writing of the essay. I’m not sure how else to explain this statement used in the lambasting of the State of Virginia:

It was in Virginia that they invented the device of searching for contraband whiskey in women’s underwear…

What? No wonder Prohibition was so popular. Menken saves his best though for the people of the State of Georgia:

If one turns to such a commonwealth as Georgia the picture becomes far darker. There the liberated lower order of whites have borrowed the worst commercial bounderism of the Yankee and superimposed it upon a culture that, at bottom, is but little removed from savagery. Georgia is at once home to the cotton-mill sweater and the most noisy and vapid sort of chamber of commerce, of the Methodist parson turned Savonarola and of the lynching bee… There is state with more than half the area of Italy and more population than either Denmark or Norway, and yet in thirty years it has not produced a single idea.

Granted, Georgia was not exactly a model of an enlightened populace at the time.

This is such a strange essay. On the one hand, Mencken appears to promote racial tolerance on some level. Yet he rambles on about “good blood” and “bad blood” like someone in Harry Potter book. He says that the former Southern aristocracy (i.e. slave owners) created the highest level of civilization that this country had ever seen. He even “doubts very much” that the “poor white trash” remaining in the south are actually of Anglo-Saxon blood.

It’s crazy talk I tell ya. At best, the essay just didn’t age very well. I am certainly no Mencken scholar, so I don’t know if this essay is representative of his output. I hope not.

The Best Non-fiction I read for the first time in 2007

My 2007 best-of list includes several books that were published in the recent past, but I only got around to reading this year. It includes a few that I read for job-related reasons, but I think others outside of academia could and should enjoy them.

Here’s my Top Ten:

Imperial Life in the Emerald City. I’m not quite finished with this one, but it’s already one of the most maddening books I’ve ever read. If you read it and get so mad at your government that you stop paying income taxes and the IRS prosecutes, don’t blame me. Blame Dick Cheney. Or Donald Rumsfeld. Or Doug Feith. Gen. Tommy Franks famously described Feith, the Pentagon official responsible for postwar planning in Iraq as “the fucking stupidest guy on the face of the earth.” This book makes it clear that Franks was being charitable.

The Wild Trees. The best book I read this year. Something about Preston’s prose makes me sit up a little straighter.

From Civil Rights to Human Rights: Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Struggle for Economic Justice. This fresh look at King recasts him as a democratic socialist who also happened to be a black leader. It’s a striking intellectual biography.

Freedom Riders.  The best narrative history of the civil rights movement I know of, it combines two compelling but different stories: the drama of the freedom rides and the less noticeable but equally important long-term organizing of the black communities through which they traveled.

Arc of Justice: A Saga of Race, Civil Rights, and Murder in the Jazz Age. My students in an honors US history survey course loved this book. It deserved all of the major awards it won last year.

What is the What. I guess this belongs in non-fiction. Whatever it is, it’s a remarkable book.

Death in the Haymarket. Another book that I’ve assigned to a class, this is a timely reminder that Americans have been dealing with (and overreacting to) terrorism on home soil for a while now.

Redemption: The Last Battle of the Civil War. As Ed Ayers, a terrific historian himself, writes in this review, Lemann “tells a story we keep trying to forget.” The period of Reconstruction and “Redemption” was doubly damaging for the US: not only did the people of the US not take advantage of the window of opportunity they had to remake a slave society after defeating the CSA, they have mischaracterized and misunderstood the period ever since, learning none of the lessons they (we) should have learned from it.

The Dangerous Book for Boys. I’m psyched to tie some knots, build some forts, start some fires, etc., using how-to guides from this book, with my boys when they get a little older.

And since a Top Ten list has to have ten items: About Alice. I actually haven’t read this one yet, but I mean to, and I feel like I knew Alice Trillin from Calvin Trillin’s essays that have appeared in the New Yorker and in other collections over the years. Trillin is my favorite writer about one of my favorite subjects, food. Of all the people I have never met — and there are billions of them out there — Trillin is the one person I would most like to take to Kreuz Market in Lockhart, Texas, for barbecue. His food essays are about food, sure, but a lot else besides. Take this one, which at first glance is about the difference between take-out food in New York and San Francisco (and a paean to the Mission burrito, one of the great inventions of the last two centuries). But it’s really about how deeply he loves and misses his daughter — and Alice, whom Trillin had recently lost when he wrote this.

Ding Dong the Witch is Dead

In encouraging news, times may be getting leaner for arch-conservative book sales.  Although, the numbers are still a little scary.  At the bottom of this article, it notes that Ann Coulter’s latest book only spent four weeks on the New York Times best-seller list and only sold 93,000 copies over a ten-week period.  I think that many fiction writers would call that a smashing success.

In Lieu of Work

Kerry at Pickle Me This posts her favorite books of 2007. Kerry’s list is different than any other year-end list of favorites that I’ve seen so far — her list includes only one male author. The only overlap between our lists is Vendela Vida’s May the Northern Lights Erase Your Name – the only woman on my list of favorites.

Khaled Hosseini writes about his first trip back to Afghanistan since 1976.

The Guardian lists their 10 picks for outstanding fiction. Their list differs from the usual picks that we’re seeing on this side of the Atlantic.

The Telegraph (UK) and the L.A. Times remember the Year in Books on each side of the Atlantic.

NPR talks to independent booksellers about their favorite books of 2007.

The Washington Post offers another book gift guide.

Arrrrrrrrrr Vey!

I love misunderstood lyrics. We’ve all suffered that embarrassment of *knowing* the words to a song and then finding out, sometimes years after the fact, that we weren’t even close. The high comedy moment of our weekend revolved around that kind of misunderstanding.

After watching the Joe Strummer documentary, The Future is Unwritten, I was inspired to get around to learning Redemption Song on guitar. (The song doesn’t feature in the documentary at all, but Strummer covered the song on his last album with the Mescaleros. And I’m trying to learn the original Bob Marley version, but I digress…)

Anyway, the first line of the song is “Old pirates, yes, the rob I.” I was noodling around with the song, and my daughter, 3, walked in and said, “Daddy, that’s the ‘Oh! Pirate Rabbi’ song!” That she got that much, I’m taking as a promising sign for my efforts. I spent the rest of the weekend conjuring what a pirate rabbi might look like. Here’s what I came up with.

It would have been better if I could draw a parrot on his shoulder. Or if I could draw. I think that I have my Halloween costume all lined up for next year. If you want to check out more hilarious misunderstood lyrics, check out Kiss This Guy (from a misunderstood line in Hendrix’s Purple Haze). Amazingly enough, they have two versions of the same misunderstood lyric (1, 2).

Some Links to Some Stuff

Check out the winners of the Salon Book Awards 2007 (they resisted including Savage Detectives).

Slate’s Year in Books picks the best of 2007 (no Savage Detectives here either – a trend?).

JK Rowling auctioned off a hand-written collection of fairy tales for charity this week. The Tales of Beedle the Bard, of which there are only seven copies, sold for almost £1.95M. Update: It turns out that the art dealer that purchased the book did so on behalf of Amazon. Check out the pictures of the book here.

The AJC’s book blog, The Book Page, reminds us that this week was also the 20th anniversary of the excellent non-fiction chronicle of the early days of HIV/AIDS, And the Band Played On. If you haven’t read it, I highly recommend that you check it out. The book provides a fascinating glimpse of epidemiology in action. It is also a wonderful reminder that this is not the first anti-science administration. Reagan got there first.

The Guardian reviews James Lee Burke’s Tin Roof Blow Down. In England, apparently, the book doesn’t ring true.

This is a bit dated, but… Largehearted Boy’s Book Notes with Craig Williams, author of the metal memoir Mom, Have You Seen My Leather Pants?, is hilarious.

I don’t mean to sound too dramatic, but I believe rock music to be the most important human invention since the printing press…I say this not only because I think hyperbole is the greatest literary device in history…EVER…

I love a good hyperbole joke.

The Savage Detectives

I was excited to finally get around to picking up The Savage Detectives by Roberto Bolaño. The novel has been getting great press all year long, and it is on just about everyone’s year-end best of/favorites list. I even bought the book at one of my favorite independent book stores, Faulkner House Books in New Orleans, which is usually an auspicious beginning to any novel. To say that this book disappointed me is a bit of an understatement. Frankly, I was a pissed off, if not relieved, when I finally reached the end of its 592 pages.

The Savage Detectives is supposed to be an “important” novel. It says so on the dust jacket. Maybe that should have been a warning that this book and I were not going to get along. It is told in three parts. Let me break it down:

Act 1: Mexicans Lost in Mexico

In part one, Juan García Madero tells us that he has joined an exciting new poetry movement, the Visceral Realists. He’s not sure who they are or what they are all about, but they seem cool. The Visceral Realists stage political actions like interupting other poetry readings and removing themselves from the academy and the establishment. What this means in practice is that they hang around a lot, have sex of a “frank” nature, smoke pot, and talk with no real purpose.

The Visceral Realists’ ringleaders are Ulises Lima and Arturo Belano. Lima and Belano are the charismatic, yet mysterious, leaders of the poetry movement who also seem to be involved in the drug business. We know little about their backgrounds nor their ultimate aims for the movement. Whatever, dude.

There’s a lot in this section about madness, literature, poetry, Latin American politics, and even a killer pimp. When the curtain closes on Act I, Lima, Belano, Madero, and a girl named Lupe are fleeing Mexico City under duress.

While reading this part, I thought that the purposeful intellectual distancing of the Visceral Realists from the rest of Mexican society in a vaguely intellectual way was sort of like the pointless rambling in the movie Y Tu Mamá También. I thought that this was a very clever observation on my part. Then I saw that the Amazon review said basically the same thing. Dang. Anyway, there is no way that the writers of the movie haven’t read this book is all I’m saying.

Act 2: The Savage Detectives

The second part of the novel, the lengthiest, is responsible for most of my antagonism towards the novel. In Part I, Madero told most of the story in a diary format and in a relatively straightforward way. Part 2 keeps the diary-ish format, but it is told from many, many viewpoints.

It is almost as though a Latin Ken Burns went out in the field and recorded oral histories from many people who encountered Lima and Belano in the years after the Visceral Realists disbanded. Then, rather than edit the narratives in any kind of meaningful way, Latin Ken Burns simply laid them all out one after another for you to make of them what you will. Sure, there may be many hours of footage that is irrelevant, misleading, or pointless, but Latin Ken Burns doesn’t want to contaminate the narrative with his presence, man!

Contrary to the title, there is very little detective work done in this section. It is certainly not in any way “savage.” Lima and Belano are sad, pathetic, hopeless, and incredibly unsympathetic as main characters. Almost no one who talks about them portrays them in a positive light. There are lost souls, and no one really cares.

In this part, it felt like the pointless youth of Y Tu Mamá También was intended to have given way to the romantic idealism of The Motorcycle Diaries. It didn’t work for me. In fact, if this entire 300+ page part of the novel was excised whole, very little would be lost.

Act 3: The Sonora Desert

OK, now we’re back to the single narrative diary of Juan García Madero. We resume with his flight from Mexico City in a borrowed car with Lima, Belano, and Lupe. Their wandering is not as pointless as it once was, there is a goal. The goal of their exploration of the Sonoran Desert emerged from various threads in Part 2, which could have been summarized in about five pages.

Things happen that presumably explain why Lima and Belano became the men they did are portrayed in Part 2. Really it’s too late in the novel to really care anymore, but I was too close to the finish line to put the book down. I’m sure that there was some sort of payoff there at the end, but I was too excited about being done to dwell on it.

Post Script

The New York Times (and just about everyone else) included Savage Detectives as one of their Top 10 Books of 2007. It gives me no joy to be the Russian Judge. I’m not one of those people who derives pleasure from being a contrarian. However, with this book, I am perfectly willing to be branded a philistine, or worse.  I just didn’t like it.

The NYT review by Richard Eder (presumably not the one that vaulted the novel to the Top 10 List) says:

Some of the book’s best passages are here [ed: in Part 2!]; but the formlessness, the cascading miscellany, the pile of jigsaw pieces with some missing, the guiding box-picture (fictional as against intellectual) purposefully withheld: these can make the book, or at least the reader, founder. Many gleaming lights are displayed, but foundering nonetheless.

I was left foundering. I couldn’t have said it better myself.

Silver Lining

Because the book made so many “best of” lists, it was actually back ordered for a time on Amazon. I was able to unload my used copy for more than I paid for it as a result. Score!

Just Sad

The WikiPedia entry for the novel is pathetic, and does not meet WikiPedia’s quality standards. A woman’s name, Cesárea, was originally written as “Cesarean.” I was so annoyed that I had to correct it myself. The rest includes snappy copy such as, “She is fat and gets shot by the prostitute’s pimp.” If you enjoyed the novel, you might want to help spruce that up a bit.

Got the Led Out

This is a little surreal. My friend Erik Huey wrote a recap for the Washington Post about going to see the Led Zeppelin reunion show in London (regsitration required). We have a third friend over in London, they got tickets, and now he’s writing for the Washington Post. As far as I know, he has never written for any of the top 5 US newspapers – or the bottom 5 for that matter. Hats off, EVH.

Emergency Favorites of 2007 Addendum

I was compiling my favorites of 2007 late last night, and, amdist various other SNAFUs, I forgot to include my actual FAVORITE book of the year. I’m left with a hallow feeling, searching for answers. I was working from my Shelfari list rather than the elaborate spreadsheet that I use to track these things. How did my favorite book fall through the cracks? When my wife just asked me about it, I insisted that I had read it last year. She had to show me otherwise. Ye cats!

Anyway…Book of the Year: The Raw Shark Texts by Steven Hall. How much did I love this book? I own three editions.

Raw Shark Texts - Canadian Cover Raw Shark Texts UK cover

You can also read my interview with the author here.

New Year’s Resolution: Get sh*t together

My Favorites Books of 2007 etc.

This list includes the top 10 favorites of the books that I have actually read this year (that were released in or around 2007). I won’t presume that these are the definitive best books of 2007, because that’s just ridiculous. You can check out the universe of titles that were in contention on my Shelfari shelf, which at this point includes almost all of the books that I’ve read in 2007. There are one or two that I just can’t get up on that virtual shelf for some reason. It is making me a little crazy.

In no particular order (links go to my reviews):

See my 10 favorites in all of their graphical glory here.

Platinum Level Special Commendation Honorees Of Merit: There are two books that were very special to me this year that may not be to you, unless you happen share my background/experience:

  1. James Lee Burke’s Tin Roof Blow Down – The book may have the worst cover of the year, but it is the definitive post-Katrina novel of New Orleans and south Louisiana. Amazing.
  2. Ken Well’s Crawfish Mountain. A friend of mine is reading the book now, and she said, “Wow. This book is like a love letter to you.” Yes, it is.

Favorite Cover:

Biggest Disappointment: The Savage Detectives by Roberto Bolaño (It is on just about everyone’s “best of” list this year. (Stay tuned later in the week for my review wherein I’ll explain why I am taking the role of the Russian Judge on this one.)

Top 5 books that I’m adding to my reading list based on reading other year-end lists:

Next week I’ll throw up my year-end music picks.

Evel Knievel on Kierkegaard

I was hoping for a literary reason to post this picture of an amazing Evel Knievel shrine. The NYT’s Paper Cuts has come to my rescue. The blog quotes a Martin Amis review of a John Updike novel as the source for a phrase that describes a particular kind of book review:

The adversaries of good book-reviewing are many and various, but the chief one is seldom mentioned – perhaps because of its ubiquity. We hear a lot, especially from academics, about reviews not being academic enough; and it is true that ‘name’ reviewing of the Evel-Knievel-on-Kierkegaard variety often shows the reviewer hideously stretched.

I’ll be using that.

We drove past this shrine later in the same evening and the candles were all lit. Awesome.

(photo credit – me. Picture taken on the Cabbagetown side of the Krog Street tunnel.)

LA Lists

The L.A. Times weighs in with several year-end lists:

Seen in Decatur, GA

I haven’t seen it mentioned elsewhere, but children’s books would seem to be especially ill-suited to the Kindle. No color, no fold outs, no flaps to lift, no pop-ups – kids will hate reading before they even get started.

(photo credit: my mom — taken outside of The Little Shop of Stories)

WordPress Themes