Bookslut has a review of the new Nathan Englander book The Ministry of Special Cases.
The Guardian reviews (sort of) the new Lethem, You Don’t Love Me Yet.
Chuck Pahlaniuk’s Rant is reviewed in the San Francisco Chronicle and by Janet Maslin in the New York Times.
Meanwhile, Jamestown by Matthew Sharpe gets roughed up in the New York Times. I don’t think the reviewer “got it” though. She admits, essentially, that she doesn’t follow the author “again and again” through out the book. Then she says:
He chose as one of his central metaphors the bowel movement. The novel features all manner of droppings. We see characters relieving themselves, i.e. their pants are down, i.e. they’re not looking too dignified.
Her point is that Sharpe needlessly provides what the kids call “too much information.” Luckily, the counterpoint to this argument was made in a review of the non-fiction, The True Story of Jamestown, 1607, and the Settlement of America. It notes how hapless our founding brethren truly were. The “bloody phlux” almost wiped out the entire population. Later, these colonists were found as emaciated skeletons that almost starved to death from their inability to feed themselves in a nation full of game, plant life, and fish. Not too dignified is exactly how I’d describe it. It’s a wonder we stuck around. For more on Jamestown (the fictional one) see an interview with the author at Bookslut or me.
ANYWAY…
You shivered while reading McCarthy’s The Road. You hid under the covers reading Sharpe’s Jamestown. Is The Pesthouse by Jim Crace the heir to the post-apocalyptic crown? Or just a faux-pocalyptic pretender? Find out at the NYT and the San Francisco Cronicle.
The Unnatural History of Cypress Parish by Elsie Blackwell, about Louisiana under water, is reviewed by the Washington Post Book World.
Dave Barry reviews the e-mail netiquette book Send hilariously (as is his wont) in the New York Times Book Review.
The Savage Detectives by Roberto Bolaño is reviewed in the Washington Post Book World.
The Guardian calls the non-fiction book The Islamist “a wake up call for Britain.”
Update: This just in. Michiko takes a poop on the new Don Delillo, Falling Man.
May 9th, 2007 at 11:44 am
Hmmm… Having devoured several of DeLillo’s novels and having read an excerpt of Falling Man in the New Yorker recently, I’ve been anticipating this one.
Anyone who read White Noise had to think of the Airborne Toxic Event over and over and over as we watched news coverage on 9/11. DeLillo clearly sees things about the cultural/social/psychological environment we’ve created for ourselves before almost anyone else does, and he used that to great effect at times in (but not throughout) Underworld, too. So if any novelist can tackle this subject and help us learn anything about ourselves, it’s DeLillo.
Not having read it yet, I’ll still go out on a limb and say that Kakutani just doesn’t get it. She criticizes DeLillo for not “capturing the impact of 9/11 on the country or New York or a spectrum of survivors or even a couple of interesting individuals… or the shell-shocked world it left in its wake.”
Guess what: It can’t be done. Or, to the extent that it can be done, it has already been done by the 9/11 Commission Report (an absolute masterpiece of historical writing, by the way). I don’t think a novelist can aspire to much more than DeLillo has tried to do with this treatment of 9/11, at least if he’s writing just 6 years after the fact. We’ll see.
May 9th, 2007 at 12:08 pm
I’m inclined to agree with you Dr J. I’ve long argued that Michiko is like Mikey from Life cereal - she hates everything! I was shocked - shocked - that she was on board with the new Chabon. Go figure.
May 9th, 2007 at 12:29 pm
I’ve read two extraordinary novels by DeLillo (White Noise and Libra and two terrible novellas (Cosmopolis and The Body Artist), so I don’t know what to think. At his best, there’s nobody better. At his worst, one gets the feeling that he’s read to many of his own reviews. I have the copy of The New Yorker with the story in it, so maybe I’ll give that a spin first. But, on the other hand, if he’s in the zone….
May 9th, 2007 at 5:11 pm
In this week’s New York magazine is a guide to all DeLillo’s works
http://nymag.com/arts/books/features/31522/
Herman - you’ll be happy to know that they put Cosmpolis and The Body Artist in the category “to avoid.”
May 9th, 2007 at 5:29 pm
Nitro, I agree with the guide completely. “Pafko at the Wall” is still one of my favorite pieces of writing in any genre, anywhere. Since it appeared as a novella in Harpers and the two or three other best vignettes in Underworld (the jello-making mom, the costume-partying JE Hoover) first appeared as short stories in the New Yorker, I’m thinking that the appearance of “Still-Life” in the New Yorker is a good sign.
By the way, you can check it out here:
http://www.newyorker.com/fiction/features/2007/04/09/070409fi_fiction_delillo
May 9th, 2007 at 9:02 pm
It’s hard to say if Michiko is wrong or not without reading the book ourselves. I guess someone is going to gave to step up. I nominate Dr J…