The Village Voice review for Jamestown by Matthew Sharpe called the novel “Jackass for the Jacobean set.” I am intimately familiar with Jackass, but I had to look up who exactly the “Jacobean set” might be. That should tell you on which side of that particular cultural divide I end up on. The book was in my mitts before I saw that review, so I had committed to checking this one out well before they started talking Jackass. So there.

Jamestown was also mentioned in a recent L.A. Times trend piece about the bumper crop of post-apocalyptic literature, along with some book by a guy named Cormac McCarthy. I haven’t read The Road yet, and I’m feeling more and more like the rube for having missed it before all the awards came rolling in. However, I have read Jamestown, so I feel pretty good about having adequately covered my post-apocalyptic bases.
Jamestown is set in the unspecified future. The Brooklyn Company and The Manhattan Company are at war. The Chrysler Building is crumbling to ruins in the rear view mirror of an armored bus full of settlers bound for Virginia. John Smith and John Rolfe are among the settlers. Does some of this sound familiar?
When the ragtag group gets to Virginia, they find a community of red-skinned savages from whom they hope to obtain oil, food, and otherwise exploit. The chief of the savages is a huge man named Chief Powhatan whose daughter is called Pocahontas. Powhatan’s psychiatrist and chief adviser is Sidney Feingold. Most of that also sounds familiar.
The set up is genius. Sharpe couches our uncertain future in the myths of our past. Coupled with a fantastic sense for the absurd, this book is funny to boot. Can Cormac say that? Didn’t think so.
The scenes where the settlers interact with the savages are truly inspired. Clearly the “indians” have the upper hand, but they enjoy toying with the settlers. The settlers, all city dwellers, have no idea how to get clean water, how to get unspoiled food, how to build a settlement - but that doesn’t stop them from assuming superiority over the Indians. (It turns out that the Indian’s red skin is actually 100+ SPF sunblock.)
The novel is also brutal. The violence and language are not for the delicate. I think that it is this aspect of the novel that lead the Village Voice to throw out the “Jackass” comparison. However, the brutality is not gratuitous nor is it fishing for easy laughs. I think in a post-apocalyptic world manners, decorum, and good sense may be the first victims. In the novel, the brutality is a mirror showing us our true selves with our modern comforts stripped away. Let’s face it, it’s an increasingly short trip to Lord of the Flies.
These themes made me think - always a dangerous proposition. In this country, those of us in cities often look down on those in rural areas as ignorant rubes. What do they know? I mean other than how to provide food for all of us, build houses and barns, get clean water, be stewards of the land, etc. They probably know that it would be bad to build a settlement next to a malarial swamp. But other than that…? How screwed would we be if our future survival depended upon the city mouse contingent for basics like food and water? Dude, I need to you to grow some corn for a few thousand people…
The book also includes the tragic love love story of Pocahontas and John Rolfe. Rest assured, their relationship is no less complicated or doomed in the future than it was in the past. Unlike Cormac McCarthy, Sharpe’s vision of the future has no place for familial or romantic love.
My reading of the end of the book really drove home a central theme - how we’ve become prisoners to the things that we take for granted. How much would we be willing to sacrifice to have a roof over our heads and food in the fridge? How many of our ideals have we already given up to maintain a status quo? That’ll keep you up at night.
I thought that this book was brilliant. I’ll be pissed if it doesn’t get some recognition during award season, although there may be some apocalypse fatigue by then. Who knows? With our current Administration and kids killing each other, our taste for apocalyptic literature may be just beginning.
April 18th, 2007 at 8:35 am
Can I be industry for a second and say how thrilled I am at the press one of Soft Skull’s books is getting right now? It comes at a great time (the PGW collapse leaving so many of my beloved Brooklyn indies scrambling)to put some good light forward there.
I’ve not yet read the book, though. I guess I’m the last kid on the block with the new toy:(
April 18th, 2007 at 9:43 am
It is safe to say that I probably would not have come across this title were it not for the Brooklyn in Decatur shindig that you guys co-hosted. So thanks industry.
April 18th, 2007 at 9:46 am
I think I might pick it up today, thanks to your review, DJ. Michiko Kakutani ain’t got nuttin’ on you … except I enjoy saying her name more than “DJ.”
April 18th, 2007 at 11:47 am
Maybe I should try to market my book to agents and publishers as being “pre-apocalyptic.” It really is if you read it closely.
April 18th, 2007 at 1:12 pm
Now that I’m in full post-apocalyptic mode, I will definitely be checking out Jamestown. But if you needed greater motivation to get to The Road, I saw that Winn Butler gives it his endorsement on Arcade Fire’s website. So yeah, all the cool kids have read it.
As an aside, can you recommend any post-eucalyptic books?
April 18th, 2007 at 3:02 pm
Beth: The DJ stands for Django Jalapeno, which is awfully fun to say.
Herm: It’s all pre-apocalyptic, but it may be a unique marketing strategy.
Rich: Since you provided a nice audio coupling for The Road, I have a recommendation for you. When you pick up Jamestown, I recommend coupling it with Sixteen Horsepower’s “Low Estate.”
April 18th, 2007 at 4:17 pm
Great review. I would never think to pick this book up but after reading your post, I just put in my request list at the library. And I don’t kid myself at all - I have no skills to provide food or shelter for myself and I would get pretty ugly (in all senses of the word) pretty quickly in the post apocalyptic world.
April 18th, 2007 at 6:23 pm
I’ve been chanting “Django Jalapeno” for the last 15 minutes; it IS fun to say. I think I’m going to order the Django Jalapeno pizza from Fellini’s.
May 9th, 2007 at 7:49 am
[...] Her point is that Sharpe needlessly provides what the kids call “too much information.” Luckily, the counterpoint to this argument was made in a review of the non-fiction, The True Story of Jamestown, 1607, and the Settlement of America. It notes how hapless our founding brethren truly were. The “bloody phlux” almost wiped out the entire population. Later, these colonists were found as emaciated skeletons that almost starved to death from their inability to feed themselves in a nation full of game, plant life, and fish. Not too dignified is exactly how I’d describe it. It’s a wonder we stuck around. For more on Jamestown (the fictional one) see an interview with the author at Bookslut or me. [...]
June 14th, 2007 at 10:11 am
[...] Help your favorite small publishers: Yesterday I pointed out that McSweeney’s really needs your help. They’re not the only ones. Soft Skull Press was also unfairly screwed over when the distributor for ALL of the independent houses declared bankruptcy and are also having a huge sale to move books quickly. Soft Skull is the publisher of Jamestown by Matthew Sharpe (reviewed here), African Psycho by (review coming soon!). The Codalmo blog has the full story and recommendations if you don’t know where to start (via EdRants). [...]