In the finsished column: Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro.

This book made it to my “to read” pile after I read some very positive reviews and after months of the book sitting insistently atop my Amazon recommendations. It was also a birthday gift. The book does have a surprise or twist element to it. So if this book is in your “to read” stack, you may not want to read further.
So you couldn’t resist, eh? OK. Here’s the deal. The book begins at an English boarding school in the mid-Nineties. It appears to be your typical boarding school, except something seems to be not quite right. The teachers are hiding something from the students, or at least not telling them everything that they should know. And then, slowly it is revealed. The students are all clones who are being raised to be adults who will then donate an organ at a time to those of us who need them and are, you know - normal.
The kids are raised to eventually become “carers” for their kind who begin the donations in a sequence that usually ends in “completion” after four donations. The book mentions in passing that they came up with the technology before thinking through the implications of what all this would mean. Are they really human? etc. However, once the genie was out of the bottle, there was no going back. Once your wife got a new heart, you wouldn’t really care where it came from.
The author also wrote Remains of the Day. If you saw the movie, or read the book, you may have a good feel for what the writing and tone of the book were like. It also reminded me of Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. It’s an interesting book that makes you think about some of the questions that may be coming our way before too long.
Let me preface the following comments with this : I enjoyed the book. I really did. However, its not the same book that I would have written, given the same premise. I’m not sure why the author chose to set the book in the 1990’s. Does that make it Not Science Fiction? Or because the time has already passed, it should be pretty clear that this is Fiction? The book doesn’t describe in any way the elaborate social control measures that would need to be taken to subdue the future organ donors or hide them from our recoiling view. In fact, as adults they seem to be able to roam around and have lives, cars, apartments, etc. So I kept asking myself what keeps them there? Why not keep on driving through the Chunnel and kick it in France. You want my organs - you’ll have to find me first. Where was the clone uprising against the organ-needing oppressors? It seems the author wanted to steer well clear of anything that might suggest science fiction. OK. Whatever. The book also doesn’t spell out the order of the donations, but it seems like they were all internal organs. Why not things like eyes, hands, or skin - things that would have kept them alive, possibly disfigured, beyond the three of four typical donations. These kinds of donations would have made them even freakier. Too Science Fiction?
Maybe I’ll write that book. It will feature a maverick organ donor of Cajun ancestry who drives his car through the Chunnel and lives in France with his limbless friend with no eyes who escaped by Fed-Ex-ing himself to Cannes. Yeah. I don’t want to give away all of the plot. Look for it soon wherever fine books are sold.
Note: I finished this book at the end of June. As I mentioned in another post, between baseball and the Tour, I am falling way behind in reading and posting. Thanks to Shaft for taking up some of the slack. The All Star Break is here and the Tour has a rest day, so it is catch up time. Also, Hurricane Fuckstick has canceled my vacation. Thanks for that.
July 12th, 2005 at 11:30 am
I agree with your “Handmaid’s Tale” analogy although I also thought the plot mirrored some of the elements in “Blade Runner”..the replicants and all that and I guess a little Matrix thrown in there. O.K. how about we get Harrison Ford to be the bounty hunter chasing the rogue clone, Keanu Reeves, who refuses to donate his organs because he has insider info that the recipient is also really a clone ? Damn, that’s good.
July 12th, 2005 at 12:32 pm
See, a little Sci-Fi can go a long way. How about this? Harrison Ford is conflicted because his blind daughter finally got to see when she got her eyeball transplant from Keanu’s now also limbless friend in France. Before we discuss this any further, I think we need some representation to line up a meeting with Warner Bros. so we can pitch our treatment.
July 12th, 2005 at 7:05 pm
Shit. On several levels.
July 13th, 2005 at 2:12 pm
O.k., so maybe it wasn’t entirely an original plot but there is always the remake ( Bad News Bears, Willy Wonka…blaspheme !) however, maybe we could work in a “Gattaca” angle where you are actually considered slave material if you are not genetically engineered. Yeah, that works. We’ll cast Tom Cruise as the inferior who overcomes his caste by reading L. Ron Hubbard and cloning himself but as a more perfect version i.e. not interested in the lead singer of Matchbox 20 and more gracious in interviews with Matt Lauer.
March 23rd, 2006 at 12:32 am
[...] The 2006 Tournament of Books is finally underway, with two rounds having been completed. So far, The History of Love by Nicole Krauss has bettered The Time in Between by Dave Bergen and Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close by Jonathan Safran Foer pummeled Veronica by Mary Gaitskill. To recap: The books that we have read: 2. The books we have not read: 0. Which validates something or another. You can read the judges reviews at the Morning News. Our takes on History of Love are here and here; our takes on Extremely Loud are here, here, and here. Their review of the History of Love round was pretty insipid. Anyway, the next round will feature Krauss vs. Foer, which is interesting because they are married - I doubt they are losing sleep over it. I’d go with Extremely Loud, but they are not asking me. That round is being judged by Jessa from Bookslut, and I predict that she will hate them both. Gambling Tip: She will pick Krauss because she hates Foer more. Tomorrow’s match up pits Never Let Me Down by Ishiguro (our comments here and here) vs. The Greatest Man in Cedar Hole by Stephanie Doyan. Gambling Tip 2: We’ve read Ishiguro’s book but not Doyan’s - and our record speaks for itself. Gamble accordingly. [...]